Kewenangan Dokter Spesialis Dalam Melakukan Tindakan Medis Di Klinik Utama Rawat Inap

Keywords:

Abstract

Every citizens have the same right to access the health service in the form of promotive, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative which facilities are held by the government, the local government, and the society including the primary clinic. A specialist doctor in the inpatient primary clinic has atributive, mandatory, and delegative authority based on the education standard, competency, profesional standard, and operational procedure standard. The primary clinic can conduct the mild and moderate surgery with general anesthesia. However, there is a contradiction between two regulations that later limits the authority of the specialist doctor and the anesthesia doctor to conduct the surgery.  A specialist doctor in carrying out their authority should consider the operational standard, informed consent, ethical code, and the hospital by law.  Along with the authority, the doctor also has a huge responsibility to treat the patients based on the procedure both legally and ethically as detemined. The previous regulation, Health Ministry Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia article 9 year 2014 about clinic, has not enacted firmly about the specialist doctor’s authority in the inpatient primary clinic. The specialist doctors have legal responsibility, profesional responsibility, ethical and discipline responsibility, criminal law responsibility, civil law responsibility, and administrative law responsibility Therefore, we recommend to conduct a judicial review on Health Ministry Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia article 9 year 2014 about the specialist doctor’s authority.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Muhamad Sadi Is, Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan, Kencana Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta, 2015, h. 7

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, Profil kesehatan Indonsia tahun 2016, Jakarta , Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2017, h.75

Muntaha, Hukum Pidana Malpraktek Pertanggungjawaban dan penghapus Pidana, Sinar Grafika , Jakarta Timur , 2017, h.53

Lutfi Effendi, Pokok-pokok Hukum Administrasi, Cetakan III, Bayumedia, Malang, 2004, h .77- 79

Ridwan Syahrani, Seluk Beluk dan Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata, Bandung, Cet 4, Pt.Alumni, 2000, h. 2.

Sri Supraptiningsih, Kedudukan Hukum Perawat dalam Upaya Pelayanan Kesehatan di Rumah Sakit. Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2006, h 126.

H.Zainudin Ali,M.A, Metode Penelitian Hukum ,Sinar Grafika . Jakarta 2015 h. 25-26

Mertokusumo Sudikno, Penemuan Hukum, Liberty, Yogjakarta 2007, h.18.

Marzuki Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta 2005, h.59-60.

Wila Chandrawila Supriadi, Hukum Kedokteran,.Mandar Maju .Bandung .2001. h 5

Ibid. h.104.

J. Guwandi, Hukum Medik (Medical Law), Fakulatas Kedokteran Universitas Jakarta, 2004. h. 225.

Cecep Triwibowo, ibid. h .243

Rosa Agustina. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jakarta, Penerbit Pasca Sarjana FH Universitas Indonesia. 2003 h.117

Soerjono Soekamto (I) dan Kartono Mohamad, aspek Hukum dan etika kedokteran di Indonesia , Jakarta . Grafiti Pers.1983.h.69

Suryodiningrat,Perikatan-Perikatan Bersumber Perjanjian, Bandung, Transito, 2011, h. 99.

Wiryono Prodjodikoro, Hukum Perdata Persetujuan-Persetujuan Tertentu, Jakarta, Sumur Bandung , Cet. VII, 2014, h. 152.

Mahrus Ali, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Korporasi dalam Russel Heaton, Criminal Law Textbook, Oxford University Press, London, 2006, h. 403.

H. Syahrul Machmud, Penegakan Hukum danPerlindungan Hukum Bagi Dokter Yang Diduga MelakukanMedikal Malpraktek, Karya Putra Darwati. Cet. I, Bandung,2012. H 17.



Title Kewenangan Dokter Spesialis Dalam Melakukan Tindakan Medis Di Klinik Utama Rawat Inap
Issue: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA
Section Articles
Published: Dec 16, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v5i2.37
Author
  • Ns Pamuji
  • M Khoirul Huda