ATR/BPN Regulation Policy Number 2 of 2024 Concerning the Moratorium on Protected Rice Field Land Reviewed from the Perspective of Legal Objectives (Benefit)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Articles
- Issue: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026)
-
Published: Jun 2, 2026
Abstract
Introduction to the Problem: The main problem in this study is the urgency of the moratorium policy for the establishment of the Regulation of the Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN) Number 2 of 2024 concerning Protected Rice Fields (LSD) and the moratorium policy is reviewed from the perspective of Utilization.
Purpose/Study Objectives: This study aims to analyze the urgency of the moratorium policy for the stipulation of the Regulation of the Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN) Number 2 of 2024 concerning Protected Rice Fields (LSD) and the moratorium policy from the perspective of Utilization.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This study uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach (Statue approach) and a conceptual approach (Conceptual approach). Legal materials consist of primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary legal materials and qualitative descriptive analysis is carried out.
Findings: The urgency of the moratorium policy on Protected Rice Fields (LSD) as stipulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 2 of 2024 is not just an administrative instrument, but a manifestation of progressive legal policies that also provide preventive legal protection against the threat of land degradation, which in turn makes a real contribution to national food sovereignty. From the point of view of legal benefits, the policy of suspending Protected Agricultural Land can be seen as an action of state intervention to achieve a balance between development interests and the protection of agrarian resources.
Paper Type: Research Article
Downloads
References
Armaya, I. (2025). Study on the Impact of Agricultural Land Transfer on Regional Food Security. Circle Archive, 1(7).
Efata, A. C., SH, M. K., Retno Mawarini, S., & SH, M. (2025). Dekonstruksi Hukum Dalam Pengaturan Alih Fungsi Lahan Untuk Menjamin Kepastian Hukum. Untag Press
Erwahyuningrum, R. (2023). Legal Problems in the Determination of Protected Rice Fields (LSD) in Indonesia. Journal of History Education and Social Research in the Humanities, 3(2), 145-152.
HK, A. P., Yasa, I. W., Setyawan, F., Adiwibowo, Y., & Manggala, F. P. (2023). The Impact of Protected Rice Field (LSD) Conversion on Rural Food Security in Jember Regency. Inicio Legis, 4(2), 167-181.
Ilhami, W. R., Khonsa, F. N. A., & Putra, S. A. (2024). The Impact of Land Conversion on Rice Production in Central Java: An Economic Analysis. Agrimics Journal, 1(2), 99-108.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, (2013), Metode Penelitian Hukum, Kencana , Jakarta.
Robbi, Y. F. N. (2024). Legal Aspects of Protected Rice Fields and Spatial Planning. Fundamentals: Scientific Journal of Law, 13(2), 90-116.
Sanjesti, W., & Silviana, A. (2025). The impact of the conversion of agricultural land to dry land. Legal Standing: Journal of Legal Sciences, 9(2), 420-435.
Sigit Sapto Nugroho, (2024), Pokok-Pokok Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Lakeisha, Klaten.
_____, (2025), Hukum Pertanian, Underline, Klaten.
Septyaningsih, I. A. (2024). Metro City Regional Government Policy on the Transfer of Agricultural Land to Non-Agricultural Land (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Metro).
Yunitasari, D. (2025). The Impact and Challenges of Stopping Rice Imports Through the Acceleration of National Food Self-Sufficiency. Journal of Economic and Business Management, 1(2).
| Title | ATR/BPN Regulation Policy Number 2 of 2024 Concerning the Moratorium on Protected Rice Field Land Reviewed from the Perspective of Legal Objectives (Benefit) |
|---|---|
| Issue: | Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA |
| Section | Articles |
| Published: | Jun 2, 2026 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v12i1.365 |
| Keywords: | Protected rice fields;, Moratorium:, Legal benefits., Protection of agrarian resources. |
| Author |
