The Importance of Witness A De Charge as Evidence for the Defendant in the Crime of Domestic Violence (KDRT) (Case Study of Decision No. 3339/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Sby)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Articles
- Issue: Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024)
-
Published: Dec 3, 2024
Abstract
Introduction to the Problem: The law was created to regulate and protect all components of society. The preamble of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 point C concerning Criminal Procedure Law explains that national development in the field of criminal procedure law is intended to make the community appreciate their rights and obligations and to improve the attitude of law enforcers and the protection of human dignity, order and legal certainty for the implementation of the rule of law in accordance with the 1945 Constitution.
Purpose/Study Objectives: This research aims to find out how important the position of witness a de charge is for the defendant in the crime of domestic violence.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This research uses normative juridical research methods. Data collection was carried out by means of literature and document studies. Data analysis was carried out using analytical descriptive methods and using a qualitative approach.
Findings: The results showed that there is a right to submit witnesses or experts that have been given by the law by the suspect or defendant as referred to in Article 65 of the Criminal Procedure Code, so that the examiners at all levels of examination are obliged to ask the suspect or defendant, but there is no obligation for the defendant to present witnesses in the trial so that it will not affect the legal status of the defendant.
Paper Type: Research Article
Downloads
References
Bawono, Bambang Tri. “Tinjauan Yuridis Hak-Hak Tersangka Dalam Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan”. Jurnal Hukum. Vol. XXVI, No. 2, Agustus 2011.
Chaimansyah, Eky. “Hak Tersangka/Terdakwa Untuk Mengajukan Saksi A De Charge (Saksi Meringankan) Dalam Proses Perkara Pidana”. Lex Crimen Vol. V/No. 2/Feb/2016.
Prasetia, M. Edo Rezawan, Sandhi Permana, dan Yunita Kurnia Dewi. “Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Gratifikasi”. Jurnal Verstek Vol. 2 No. 2, 2014.
Samosir, Agustinus. “Pembuktian Terbalik: Suatu Kajian Teoretis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Jurnal Hukum Progresif: Volume XI/No.1/Juni 2017.
Elias Zadrack Leasa, “Kekuatan Keterangan Saksi Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Perkara Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga”, Jurnal Belo 4, No. 2 (2019): 188-203, https://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=1796681&val=18124&title=Kekuatan%20Keterangan%20Saksi%20Sebagai%20Alat%20Bukti%20Pada%20Perkara%20Kekerasan%20Dalam%20Rumah%20Tangga
Athaya Novita Andryanto Putri, “Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga”, Bureaucracy Journal 3, No. 2 (2023): 1433-1447, https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i2.257
Sisten Sri Ayu Ughude, “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Keterangan Saksi Korban Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga”, Lex Et Societatis 4, No. 5 (2016): 33-42, https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v4i5.11950
Wikipedia, Kekerasan, 20 Februari 2022 pukul 12.47, https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kekerasan, diakses pada hari senin, 20 Februari 2022, pukul 12.19 WIB.
Lamintang, P.A.F, dan Theo Lamintang. 2010. Pembahasan KUHAP (Menurut Ilmu Pengetahuan Hukum Pidana Dan Yurisprudensi). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Satjipto Raharjo. 2009. Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Genta Publishing.
Tolib Effendi, Dasar Dasar Hukum Acara Pidana (Perkembangan dan Pembaharuan di Indonesia) (Malang: Setara Press, 2014).
Zainuddin Ali, Metode Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2013).
Undang – Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945;
Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana;
Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Acara Pidana;
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga;
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban;
Undang – Undang nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya No. 3339/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Sby.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi 65/PUU-VIII/2010.
| Title | The Importance of Witness A De Charge as Evidence for the Defendant in the Crime of Domestic Violence (KDRT) (Case Study of Decision No. 3339/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Sby) |
|---|---|
| Issue: | Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA |
| Section | Articles |
| Published: | Dec 3, 2024 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v10i2.273 |
| Keywords: | Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga, Saksi A De Charge, Hak dan Kewajiban. |
| Author |
