Problematika Dan Implikasi Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja Pada Perseroan Terbatas


Abstract

 
Abstract— Despite the various controversies, the presence of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation have repealed at least two regulations and changed at least 80 (eight twenty) other laws. One of those affected is the Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (UU PT). Study This study intends to examine what the existing concepts and problems look like on the Omnibus Law on Job Creation, as well as its implications for the regulation and the basic concept of a Limited Liability Company. This study is a normative research (doctrinal) to secondary data obtained from literature studies (library research), which consists of primary and secondary legal materials. Research result shows that the Omnibus Law is a legislative method by unites various types of laws into one specific law. This has the potential to negate the diverse interests of each laws in the name of one interest only. In addition, the practice of drafting it in Indonesia does not have a juridical basis and violates the principle of openness and participation. In terms of its implications for the PT Law, a number of the provisions in the Omnibus Law on Job Creation have expanded the meaning of the Company Limited by presenting the Sole Proprietorship model which gives birth to a number of contradictions in the basic concept of a Limited Liability Company, in addition to removing the minimum capital limit of the Company which is feared will cause vulnerabilities for business continuity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Buku

Irwansyah. 2020, Penelitian Hukum, Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana, Yogyakarta.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2006, Penelitian Hukum, cetakan ke-2. Kencana, Jakarta.

Christiawan, Rio. 2021, Omnibus Law: Teori dan Penerapannya. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Dodek, Adam M, 2006, Omnibus bills: Constitutional constraints and legislative liberations. Ottawa L

Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2015, Ilmu Hukum, PT.Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung.

Lihat Harahap, Yahya.2021, Hukum PerseroanTterbatas. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Handri Raharjo, S. H., 2012, Hukum Perusahaan. MediaPressindo, Jakarta.

Gunawan, Widjaja,2008, 150 Tanya Jawab Tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Forum Sahabat, Jakarta.

Jurnal

Bayu Dwi Anggono, “Omnibus Law Sebagai Teknik Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Peluang Adopsi Dan Tantangannya Dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia,” Jurnal Rechts Vinding, Vol. 9 No 1 Tahun 2020.

Muhamad Azhar, “Omnibus Law Sebagai Solusi Hiperregulasi Menuju Sonkronisasi Peraturan Per-Undang-Undangan Di Indonesia,” Administrative Law and Governance Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1 Tahun 2019.

Niru Anita Sinaga, “Hal-Hal Pokok Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas,” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara Vol 8 No. 2 Tahun 2018.

Permwanichagun, Pattarawadee, Sumeth Kaenmanee, Aree Naipinit, and Thongphon Promsaka Na Sakolnakorn, The situations of sole proprietorship, E-commerce entrepreneurs and trends in their E-commerce: A case study in Thailand. Asian Social Science, Vol 10, No. 21, Tahun 2014.

Muhammad Faiz Aziz and Nunuk Febriananingsih, “Mewujudkan Perseroan Terbatas (Pt) Perseorangan Bagi Usaha Mikro Kecil (Umk) Melalui Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Cipta Kerja,” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Vol 9 No.1 Tahun 2020.

Peraturan PerUndang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.

Title Problematika Dan Implikasi Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja Pada Perseroan Terbatas
Issue: Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA
Section Articles
Published: Nov 14, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v8i2.187
Keywords: Omnibus Law, Legal Implications;, Limited Liability Company Individual
Author
  • Krista Yitawati
  • Anik Tri Haryani
  • Subadi
  • Adilla Nila Krusita