Daluwarsa Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Sudut Pandang Teori Hukum : Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara

Keywords:
Copyright and Licensing:
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fina Rosalina

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember

Abstract

The imposition of the expiration date on the criminal act of corruption is still debatable whether it can enforce. The Corruption Eradication Act does not specifically regulate the expiration period, causing legal uncertainty and creating dualism of views on the application of the expiration period, which in turn has the potential to cause state financial losses. This study aims to find the expired concept of corruption through the point of view of legal theory. The legal theory used is the theory of consequences (leer van het gevolg). The critical use of the theory of consequences (leer van het gevolg) serves to embody the theoretical concepts and factual conditions of eradicating corruption in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical method that is prescriptive. This research found that the term act (feit) in the provisions of Article 79 of the Criminal Code means fulfilling all elements of a criminal act. Where the criminal act of corruption in the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption is a material offense, must carry out the expiration since the result of state financial losses appears on the surface. The characteristics of white-collar crime in corruption are appropriate for applying the theory of consequences (leer van het gevolg). The jurisprudence of the Supreme Court's decision which states that the crime of corruption is a multi-national crime strengthens the implementation of the UNCAC international instrument regarding the extension of the expiration period of the criminal act of corruption. This study Concludes That the provisions of Article 79 of the Criminal Code regarding expiration are not suitable to be applied in cases of corruption in Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

A. Buku

Andi Sofyan and Nur Azisa, 2016, Hukum Pidana, Pustaka Pena, Makassar.

Bryan A Garner, “Black’s Law Dictionary”, West Group, United State Of America, 1999.

I Dewa Gede Atmajaya and I Nyoman Putu Adiartha, 2018, Teori Teori Hukum, Setara Press, Malang

Jan Remmelink, 2003, Hukum Pidana, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

J.E Jonkers, 1987, Hukum Pidana Hindia Belanda, PT Bina Aksara, Jakarta

Muhammad Hatta, 2019, Kejahatan Luar Biasa (extra ordinary crime), Unimal Press, Lhokseumawe.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2005, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Predana Media Group, Jakarta.

P.A.f Lamintang and Simons, 1992, Kitab Pembelajaran Hukum Pidana, Pionir Jaya, Bandung.

R Soesilo, 1995, Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana, Politeia, Bogor.

Sudaryono and Natangsa Surbakti, 2017, Hukum Pidana (Dasar Dasar Hukum Pidana Berdasarkan KUHP dan RUU KUHP), Muhammadiyah University Press, Surakarta.

B. Jurnal

Andreas N Marbun, “Konsep Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi”.

Arman Manoppo, “Pengenaan Waktu Daluarsa Penuntutan dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau dari KUHP dan Undang Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Lex Crimen, Vol. Vol. VIII/No. 3, March, 2019.

Eddy O.S Hiariej, “Beberapa Catatan RUU KUHAP Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”.

Indah Febriani Kaligis2, “Daluwarsa Penuntutan Pidana Ditinjau dari Pasal 78 KUHP”, Lex Crimen, Vol. Vol. VII/No. 1, March, 2018.

Layli Maghhfiro and Dini Dewi Heniarti, “Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Majelis Hakim Kasasi Dihubungkan dengan Gugurnya Hak Menuntut (Studi Kasus Perkara No.545 K/Pid.Sus/2013)”, Prosiding Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Islam Bandung, Vol. 3 no 2, 2017.

Rayhand Purnama, “ICW: 18 Kasus Besar di KPK Terancam Kedaluwarsa”.

Wicipto Setiadi, “KORUPSI DI INDONESIA (Penyebab, Bahaya, Hambatan dan Upaya Pemberantasan, Serta Regulasi)”, Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. Vol 15 No.3, November, 2018.

Yenti Ganarsih, “Paradigma Baru dalam Pengaturan Anti Korupsi di Indonesia Dikaitkan dengan UNCAC 2003”, Jurnal Hukum Prioris, Vol. Volume 2, Nomor 3, September, 2009.

A. Lain-Lain

Biro Hukum Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, 2019, Menggagas Perubahan Undang Undang TIPIKOR: Kajian Akademik dan Draf Usulan Perubahan, KPK, Jakarta.

Hukum online.com, “KPK Anggap Dakwaan Miranda Belum Daluwarsa”.

Romli Atmasasmita, https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/penyidikan_dan_penyelidikan_korupsi.pdf.

Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang Undang Tentang Pemasyarakatan.

B. Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Kitab Undang-Undang No 31 Tahun 1999 jo Undang Undang no 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana korupsi

UNCAC yang telah diratifikasi melalui Undang Undang No 7 Tahun 2006

Title Daluwarsa Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Sudut Pandang Teori Hukum : Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara
Issue: Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA
Section Articles
Published: Nov 14, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v8i2.169
Keywords: corruption crime, expiration period, legal theory
Author Fina Rosalina
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
 PDF
How to Cite
Rosalina, F. . (2022). Daluwarsa Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Sudut Pandang Teori Hukum : Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara . YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 8(2), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v8i2.169
 view Abstract : 140      Downloads : 284